User Tools

Site Tools


hitidentification

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
hitidentification [2014/02/26 13:38]
rkiss [WORKFLOW VALIDATION]
hitidentification [2014/02/26 14:22] (current)
rkiss [WORKFLOW VALIDATION]
Line 38: Line 38:
 ===== WORKFLOW VALIDATION ===== ===== WORKFLOW VALIDATION =====
  
-If you have a workflow and you are planning to execute it on a large dataset, it is suggested to test the efficiency of the workflow. A virtual screening workflow, for example, can be tested using known reference ligands and "​decoy"​ (presumable) inactive compounds by analyzing how the workflow can discriminate the known reference ligands from the decoys. Using the **[[https://​mcule.com/​search/​screen/​workflow-validation/​|Workflow validation]]** featureyou can generate a rank ordered list of the actives and decoys and the most critical graphs are displayed that helps you judge if the workflow is worth to be executed e.g. to screen the whole Mcule database.+The **[[https://​mcule.com/​search/​screen/​workflow-validation/​|Workflow validation]]** feature ​helps you to test the efficiency of your built workflows. You can generate a rank ordered list of actives and decoys and the most critical graphs are displayed that helps you judge if the workflow is worth to be executed e.g. to screen the whole Mcule database.
  
 **[[workflowvalid|Learn more about Workflow Validation »]]** **[[workflowvalid|Learn more about Workflow Validation »]]**
  
  
hitidentification.txt · Last modified: 2014/02/26 14:22 by rkiss