User Tools

Site Tools


hitidentification

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
hitidentification [2014/01/01 15:33] flackhitidentification [2014/02/26 12:38] – [WORKFLOW VALIDATION] rkiss
Line 36: Line 36:
  
 **[[tools|List of available workflow steps »]]** **[[tools|List of available workflow steps »]]**
 +===== WORKFLOW VALIDATION =====
 +
 +If you have a workflow and you are planning to execute it on a large dataset, it is suggested to test the efficiency of the workflow. A virtual screening workflow, for example, can be tested using known reference ligands and "decoy" (presumable) inactive compounds by analyzing how the workflow can discriminate the known reference ligands from the decoys. Using the **[[https://mcule.com/search/screen/workflow-validation/|Workflow validation]]** feature, you can generate a rank ordered list of the actives and decoys and the most critical graphs are displayed that helps you judge if the workflow is worth to be executed e.g. to screen the whole Mcule database.
 +
 +**[[workflowvalid|Learn more about Workflow Validation »]]**
 +
 +
hitidentification.txt · Last modified: 2014/02/26 13:22 by rkiss